Tag Archives: water privatisation

Mozambique: former water officials arrested for corruption

Mozambique’s anti-corruption agency GCCC has arrested the former director and financial administrator of the central regional office of the government’s Water Supply Investments and Assets Fund (FIPAG).

José Duarte and Henriques Leonardo were expelled from FIPAG in mid-2011, but it apparently took over a year to compile the case against them.

Duarte is accused of creating a private water supply company, Recta, which competed with FIPAG to supply water to ships in Beira port.

The activities of Duarte and Leonardo are said to have caused FIPAG losses of 37 million meticais [US$ 1.23 million].

The IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre is supporting Cowater Consultores Lda. to develop an appropriate anti-corruption strategy and plan with the Direcção Nacional de Águas (DNA) in Mozambique [1].

In April 2012, the government decreed that FIPAG would outsource water distribution to the private sector and restrict its activities financing and managing water assets [2].

[1] Developing a water anti-corruption strategy in Mozambique, IRC, 29 Nov 2011

[2] Mozambique: government relaunches water supply privatisation, Agencia de Informacao de Mocambique / allAfrica.com, 04 Apr 2012

Related websites:

Source:

  • Mozambique: Former Water Supply Officials Arrested, Agencia de Informacao de Mocambique/allAfrica.com, 02 Nov 2012
  • Diário de Moçambique, Gabinete de Combate à Corrupção prende ex-directores regional e financeiro do FIPAG, @Verdade, 01 Nov 2012

Ghana: Ghana Water Company under fire

The Ghana Water Company Limited (GWCL) is under fire from both the government and anti-privatisation activists for poor service delivery and corruption. In the wake of this criticism, Aqua Vitens Rand Limited (AVRL), the private operator which supports GWCL since 2006 as part of a World Bank-supported project, has launched an effort to collect unpaid bills. The World Bank maintains that the project is making significant progress.

Full story

The Ministry of Water Resources, Works and Housing has constituted a committee to review the management contract between Ghana Water Company Limited (GWCL) and Aqua Vitens Rand Limited (AVRL).

The review exercise was prompted by the problems hindering water delivery, especially in urban areas, and the implementation of the US$ 80 million World Bank sponsored Urban Water Project between GWCL and AVRL. (See also Wikipedia – Water privatization in Ghana).

Water minister Albert Abongo said the misunderstanding between the AVRL and the GWCL about their respective responsibilities in regard to water operations, revenue management and maintenance of systems was having a debilitating effect on water.

Mr Abongo said government was not pleased with the performance of the expatriate management operator, AVRL, which was contracted by the previous government to improve management practices at GWCL.

He said it was too early at this stage to recommend termination of the contract.

Mr Abongo said a steering committee to be chaired by him, would help to address inefficiencies that would be identified by the review committee.

Answering a question as to whether the public should expect a shake-up in the management of GWCL, Mr Abongo said a change in attitude rather than a massive clean-up of personnel would reverse problems facing the company.

He asked the GWCL to tackle the diversion of company property by personnel for their personal use, which he said remained a major drawback on the operations of the company.

Mr Abongo said some staff of GWCL also connived with the public to engage in illegal water connections, depriving the company of revenue.

The National Coalition against Privatisation of Water (NCAP) is considering dragging GWCL and AVRL to court for what it describes as poor service delivery, if all the petitions and interventions it has brought against the two companies fail to yield the desired results.

The group has already petitioned the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), and was in the process of sending another petition to the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ), to investigate AVRL’s inability to meet their performance targets, as well as the claim that they made about GH¢30million [US$ 21 million] profit, which has been denied by the GCWL.

One of the key issues NCAP has raised about the management contract between the GWCL and AVRL is the reduction of Non-Revenue Water (NRW) by 5% each year.

Per the contract estimation, this should have been 40% in 2008, but the NCAP claims that it is 51.7%, that is 11.7% higher than the target.

According to the NCAP there has been only a 2% increase in production, mainly due to expansion works at Dalum (Tamale), Sekyere Hemang and Bafiakrom in the Central Region, with only a 1% increase in installed capacity.

The AVRL appears to be taking the criticism to heart by announcing that debtors will be disconnected and prosecuted if they don’t settle their arrears. It is offering a GH¢20 [US$ 14] reward for all “who divulge [via a Toll Free number] information on unscrupulous and anti-social citizens who indulge in malpractices like illegal connections, self reconnection, the use of in-line suction pumps.”

The World Bank remains upbeat about the Ghana Urban Water Project. In the FY09 status of report of projects in Ghana, published in October 2009, the Bank says:

“Significant progress has been made towards achieving the objective of restoring long-term financial stability, viability and sustainability of the Ghana Water Company Limited by: (a) having already reached the target of recovering 100% of the operation and maintenance costs from the utility revenues; (b) having surpassed the efficiency target of less than 10 employees per 1,000 connections; and (c) having promulgated the National Water Policy.”

Source : Accra Daily Mail / allAfrica.com, 19 Oct 2009 ; Ghanaian Chronicle / allAfrica.com, 16 Oct 2009 ; Peace FM Online, 02 Nov 2009

Kenya: private water supply deal sparks cost inflation fear

Kenya is seeking a private sector solution to its burgeoning water supply shortages in a deal that could see a steep rise in costs and deny access to the millions of urban residents in the bottom income bracket. The deal proposes to open the harvesting and purification of underground water for pumping to homes and offices through existing supply networks owned by local authorities.

It was revealed through invitation of tenders from qualified bidders who are expected to tap underground water and add some 300,000 cubic metres to the supply networks in Nairobi, and the surrounding districts before a national roll-out.

Five independent water producers will sink large boreholes around the capital to boost supply that have been declining with changes in weather patterns, according to Water ministry officials.

The plan paves the way for the entry of private equity-backed commercial water providers, mostly from Europe, to take a piece of the lucrative water business, that analysts say is set to deepen with the rapid growth in the urban population.

Kenya currently relies on state-owned service providers and not for profit organisations to meet its water supply needs but rampant corruption, ageing supply networks and illegal connections have rendered the systems ineffective.

The entry of private capital in the water supply business though expected to boost quality and volumes could also come with a heavy cost burden, analysts warned.

[...] The offer to the private sector would constitute 40 per cent stake of the city’s water supply –estimated to generate annual revenues of Sh7 billion.

[Calling in the help of the private sector] amounts to an admission by the government that state backed water providers have failed to meet the country’s water needs making it necessary, for the first time, to rope in private investors.

Water drillers

This condition [to drill boreholes at depths of between 600 and 1000 meters] knocks off nearly all the 40 locally based water drillers whose previous assignments have been restricted to depths of between 150 and 250 meters, [and as a consequnece] investors will most likely come from abroad. Local firms, however, can form a consortium with the international investors to get a piece of the business.

Under the new supply arrangement, private water producers will sell water in bulk to the established operators with large networks such as the Nairobi Water and Sewerage Company – placing them at the same level as Independent Power Producers (IPP) who generate and sell electricity to Kenya Power and Lighting Company (KPLC).

Potential investors have up to October 19 to present their bids for evaluation in November. The winners will be announced in January to allow them set operations by April.

Water sector players reckon that the new plan could increase the cost of water significantly as the private investors look to reap returns and cover operational expenses that are expected to rise as the country turns to the more expensive underground water harvesting.

The country draws a huge chunk of its water from the surface and channelled into dams, which is cheaper compared to underground water.

On average, light water consumers using tapped water drawn from rainwater are charged a subsidized rate of Sh20 per cubic meter or 1000 litres while heavy consumers pay up to Sh55. Community- based water projects that are sprucing up in peri-urban areas with the backing of some local banks are charging as much Sh60 per cubic metre.

Aggro Irrigation and Pump services, a local borehole driller reckon that one would requires in excess of Sh25 million to drill a well of 1000 meters, which excludes equipment costs such as pumps and pipes as well as operational expenses including staff, rent and fuel for running the pumps.

The private investors will be required to drill between 30 and 50 wells.

[...] Fears of a possible increase in water prices comes barely a year after water companies increased their tariffs by at least 50 per cent for small users and by larger margins for industrial consumers. The expectations of the possible rise in water costs will step up the frequency of high utility bills that have persisted this year with high electricity prices.

Electricity cost

The combined impact of high water and power tariffs is expected to pile inflationary pressure in an economy where recently unveiled official data is showing that households have knocked off some goods and services from their budgets to navigate the turbulent economic environment. The impact of high inflation is already showing in reduced consumer purchasing power.

But the water regulator says it’s would not sit and watch consumers getting reaped, adding that the private operators would have to justify any price increases.

“At the end of the day water is still a basic right, so [we] will ensure that it’s made available at an affordable cost,” Mr Robert Gakubia, the chief executive of the Water Services Regulatory Board, said in an interview, adding that the regulator will not approve any tariff that seeks to exploit water consumers.

But the country has little choice since the government and existing water service providers has no cash and expertise to rollout the underground water project.

[...] But to water consumers paying more for water is a lesser evil compared to the pain of going without water. More recently, however, soaring demand for water coupled with under investment on water infrastructure and poor weather has led to perennial water shortages across most urban centers.

Nairobi, for instance, has been experiencing acute shortage of water for the last three years brought home by insufficient rain. This has forced the Nairobi Water Company to rollout a water rationing programme where residents get water at least once a week.

As a result, residents have to buy water daily with a 20-litre container going for between Sh5 and Sh10. People who own boreholes are now also selling the water turning water vending into a lucrative trade. Nairobi has over 3,000 boreholes — some, which are privately owned by individuals or institutions. To ease the problem, the government has been providing water using tankers and drilled boreholes, but most of them have been dug at depths that cannot sustain a commercial venture.

Source: Michael Omondi, Business Daily / allAfrica.com, 07 Oct 2009

Mozambique: positive results claimed for delegated water management

The Mozambican Minister of Public Works, Felicio Zacarias, said on 29 June 2009 that the reforms in water supply that began in 1995, and which have led to delegating the management of urban water supply in major cities to private consortia, have produced positive results. Investments in water systems have lead to an increase in the number of people they serve, and in the number of hours of supply per day. Zacarias was speaking in Maputo during the launch of a “Case Study on Delegated Management of Water Supply in Mozambique“, sponsored by the World Bank.

The average period of supply in the area under delegated management is 18 hours a day, and in some cases it reaches 24 hours a day. In the urban areas covered by delegated management, 54 per cent of the population now has access to clean drinking water.

Many challenges still remain, including the need to ensure improved levels of satisfaction among consumers and expanding water systems to peri-urban areas.

The World Bank study covers the period 2000-2007. Initial setbacks led to the main partner in the “Aguas de Mocambique” (Waters of Mozambique) consortium, the French company SAUR, to drop out. By 2007, the initial problems had been solved. The success of the reforms is attributed to the government’s commitment, the creation of a separate public body that owns the main water assets (FIPAG), and of a non-political regulatory body, and the continuity and professionalism of leading figures in the sector, despite the change in management.

The study recommends that the government provide reliable and audited data to all potential private operators in the water sector so that they can make a realistic assessment of the financial risks. It urges that local private operators should be promoted, in order to minimize the costs of delegated management and ensure its long term sustainability.

Read the World Bank case study here.

Source: Agencia de Informacao de Mocambique / allAfrica.com, 30 Jun 2009

Mauritius: Who owns the rain on Rodrigues island?

With the inhabitants of the island of Rodrigues [pop. 40,000, a dependency of Mauritius, located 560 km east of Mauritius island] forced to purchase their water from the Rodrigues Water Company (RWC), Alain Leveque laments the commoditisation of the country’s natural resource. The privately-run yet government-owned RWC has installed water meters under a user-pay system without being obliged to consult the Rodriguan population. Leveque argues that not only does the RWC’s monopoly inhibit innovation and threaten price hikes, it also indicates a trend towards privatisation in direct opposition to locals’ rights and representation.

Read more: Pambazuka News, 11 June 2009

Ghana: people deserve better water services, AWN says

The Africa Water Network says that private water company Aqua Vitens Rand Limited, which manages water services in Ghana, must go.

“Water services delivered to the Ghanaian public must be among the worst in the world. Under Aqua Vitens Rand Limited (AVRL), the private company that is being paid millions of dollars of our public resources to ‘manage’ the water service, things are getting worse. In addition to unbelievable scandal of millions of hard currency paid to these most undeserving ‘foreign management experts’, ordinary people’s water charges are going up all the time – water prices for consumers have gone up a MINIMUM of 67 per cent since AVRL took over in 2006. We do not deserve this. AVRL MUST GO NOW!”

This is how the AWN press release starts. Further on it recalls the “controversy and allegations of corruption and dumping of unusable technology [such as "old meters from Netherlands"] and chemicals on Ghanaians”.

And while “while water workers [...] are subjected to ‘hardship, exploitation and dis-respect” and denied their legal exercise of trade union rights [...] a few expatriates calling themselves AVRL are being paid millions of dollars from public funds”.

“The General Secretary of the Public Utilities Workers Union (PUWU, the water workers union) has called for an enquiry by the Public Enterprises Commission into some of AVRL’s apparently illegal appointment practices”, AWN says. It also lambasts AVRL boss Andrew Barber for failing “to attend a scheduled standing committee meeting on the CBA [Collective Bargaining Agreement]” and instead taking ” ‘shareholders’ from Netherlands around to inspect part of their ‘empire’ at the Kpong works”.

Contact: Al-Hassan Adam, Coordinator, Africa Water Network, Ghana, tel: +233-21248745, +233-244208184, Email: alhassan.adam [at] gmail.com

Full statement: AWN / Pambazuka News, 05 Jun 2009

See also: Charles Takyi-Baodu, Ghana: Abrogate Acqua Vitens Contract -NGO, The Chronicle / allAfrica.com, 24 March 2009,

A request for an official reaction to AWN’s statement was sent to Aqua Vitens Rand Ltd on 11 June 2009.

Ghana: President Mills Reminded of His Promise On Water

The Essential Services Platform (ESP) has reminded Prof. John Evans Atta-Mills of his election promise to renationalize the provision of water supply to ensure quality, accessible and affordable water to all Ghanaians.

The group says the crisis state of the water provision is a reflection of the monumental failure of Aqua Vitens Rand Limited, the management entity of Ghana Water Company Limited. [...] Aqua Vitens Rand [...] are not performing to the extent that the non-provision of water to the people has assumed a national crisis, observed the ESP.

“Their contract therefore should be abrogated and provision of water supply should be re-nationalized as promised by the NDC [....] Adam Alhassan, a member of the ESP said in answer to a question last Thursday.

[A]t a forum organised by the ESP for the political parties last year, Hannah Tetteh, Trade and Industry Minister designate and NDC Communications Director, espoused the views of the President saying that she did not see why the provision of water should be in private hands.

Patrick Apoya, the Chairman for the event, found it unjustifiable that government only spends a mere 5% of its resources on such an indispensable public good like water, while donors put in 95%.

[...] Aqua Vitens Rand’s October 2008 Report suggests that “there are still no reagents and in some cases equipment to test for pesticides, lead, mercury and arsenic. [...] Delays in the replacement of old pipelines are a major source of contamination. “

According to Ben Lartey since 2005 Ghana disbursed only $38.22 million out of a $103 million for the Urban Water [...] Project leaving, a whopping sum of $ 88.55 million. “This is of great concern since this money was supposed to be used in replacement of old pipelines and machinery to improve water production. Rural water is also taking a dip, according to the World Bank’s Poverty Reduction Support Credit (PRSC), May 1, 2008,” he lamented.

Source: Ebenezer Hanson, Pubica Agenda / allAfrica.com, 09 Feb 2009

Mali: One dead, five hurt in anti-water privatisation protest

One person [named as Kassim Sidibe] died and five were injured Monday [10 November 2008] when security forces opened fire on a protest over plans to privatise drinking water distribution in northwestern Mali, hospital and official sources said.

Authorities intervened after hundreds of protesters ransacked city hall in the town of Lere and threw stones at the mayor and his deputy, injuring them and several other people, said a municipal official.

[...] Like other towns in Mali, Lere, which is in the region of Timbuktu 700 kilometres north of Bamako, suffers from water distribution problems.

A delegation of Lere residents [planned to be] in Bamako Tuesday [12 November] to ask authorities to suspend the decision to privatise drinking water distribution.

Source: AFP, 10 Nov 2008

Africa Water Congress, 10-14 Nov 2008, Johannesburg, South Africa

Conference theme:  working towards sustainable water supply throughout Africa.

Some 35 industry leaders (water utilities, government and research) from 10 African countries, with a focus on Southern and Eastern Africa, will be talking about:

  • Increasing infrastructure capacity and boosting service delivery
  • The PPP debate – what has privatisation really done for Africa’s water sector?
  • Ensuring sustainable and reliable sources of drinking water on the continent
  • How to become a world-class water supplier
  • Coping with and exceed the demand on this valuable resource

For more information go to the conference web site

Tanzania: Biwater fails in damages claim

“A British water company thrown out of Tanzania over a bungled privatisation deal has failed in its bid to win up to £10m in damages.

Biwater, whose local management team was deported from Dar es Salaam in 2005, took Tanzania’s government to the World Bank’s business tribunal in 2006, arguing that its assets had been expropriated and its contract illegally terminated.

The claim outraged anti-poverty campaigners who say the privatisation contract was forced on Tanzania, and accused the Biwater-led consortium, known as City Water, of performing worse than the state-run utility it replaced.

The International Centre for the Settlement of Investment of Disputes (ICSID) ruled on Friday [25 July 2008] that Tanzania’s government had violated its bilateral investment treaty with the UK by expelling City Water.

But the Hague-based tribunal said there were no damages to award as the company’s value was “nil” at the time of expropriation. Both parties were liable for their own legal costs – running into millions of pounds – and for the cost of arbitration, the judges ruled.

The UK-based World Development Movement [...] described the verdict as “a good day for the people of Tanzania“. In a statement, Biwater director Larry Magor said: “The rationale [not to award damages] is hard to fathom.”

Read more: Xan Rice, The Guardian, 28 July 2008